ohloneiv

 

StandardIVa4 Colaboration Template

Page history last edited by Anonymous 2 yrs ago

 

Template for Team Responses to the Accreditation Standards

 

1. Review the Specific Standard Section

 

4. The institution advocates and demonstrates honesty and integrity in its relationships with external agencies. It agrees to comply with Accrediting Commission standards, policies, and guidelines, and Commission requirements for public disclosure, self study and other reports, team visits, and prior approval of substantive changes. The institution moves expeditiously to respond to recommendations made by the Commission.       

 

2. List of Team Members working on this Standard

 

 

 

 

 

 

3. Read and Review Self-Study Questions and Suggested Source of Evidence

 

Major reference source for analyzing accreditation standards:

“Accreditation Commission Self Study Guidelines, August 2004, Guide to Evaluating Institutions”

http://www.ohlone.edu/org/instruction/docs/200408accredcomm-guidetoevaluatinginstitutions.pdf

 

4. Locate and Review the Evidence.  Include Suggested Sources of Evidence from the “Guide to Evaluating Institutions” as well as additional engagement activities conducted by your Team, such as team meetings, special meetings of existing groups, special focus groups, open forums, surveys, etc…)

 

List of evidence being reviewed and engagement activities being conducted:

 

 

 

 

5. Descriptive Summary

 

Draft a brief one or two paragraph description of what the College is doing to meet the standard.

 

 

 

 

 The College has engauged openly with outside agencies in terms of auditors, public agencies (OCR,  EPA, police, fire water district,  Bond Campaign, and Bond Review committees).    The college has benifited from the input of these groups and incorporated suggestions into policies and practice.   The colleges decision to support an environmentally sensitive and sustainable campus is evidence of this effort.  The college has maintained  complience with all external agencies both state and federal regarding changing laws, accountability reporting and  funding.  Most recent fiscal, apportionment and accoutability audits have all produced reports without comment.

 


 

6. Integration Review

 

Is there an expression of our College Values?  Is there a contribution to our College Goals?  Is there an expression of the Accreditation Themes?

 

 

 

 

 

 

7. Self Evaluation

 

Provide a rating of how well the College is addressing the specific standard using this scoring rubric:

 

1. Superior: College has worked in this area and considerable improvement is noted

2. Satisfactory: College has taken some actions to address the area and some improvement is noted.

3. Needs Improvement: College has not adequately addressed the area.

 

Rating:

 

Draft a one or two paragraph explanation for this rating based upon your assessment of the College’s activities in relation to the standard. Pay particular attention to the quality of our involvement and interventions since the last WASC self-study report.

 

 The collegoutability Reporting, NSLC, MIS data submittals, FA reporting

 

curricunet and CAPAC 

 

Invovement of top admin with other self study visits- Jim, deanna and Doug  have all served WASC  as acceditors within the last year.

 


 

Ac

Reorganization decisions ,  major policy

 

 

 

 

8. Planning Agenda

 

If the assessment process does not identify areas in need of change, simply state, No Plan Required

 

If the assessment process identifies areas in need of change, a planning agenda for improvement should be developed. The planning agenda should identify the activities and processes the institution should implement, or is implementing, to produce improvement.  How will these plans be incorporated into the evaluation and planning processes of the institution?  How will the outcomes of this planning agenda improve student learning and foster institutional improvement in general.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adapted from:  “Self Study Manual,” August 2006, A Publication of the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges Western Association of Schools and Colleges; and City College of San Francisco Self-Study Template

 

 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.